Results of Alaska Election 2014
Nearly 24 hours after polls closed for the August 19 primary election, voters in Alaska still are not certain whether the contentious Ballot Measure 1 was approved or defeated. With 100 percent of precincts reporting, the election results are still too close to call due to outstanding absentee and early voting ballots, though it appears the state's voters have opted to reject the measure, with about 52 percent voting "no." Those hoping for a "yes" vote on the measure were at first optimistic, as initial returns showed support for the measure leading. However, the early hours of August 20 painted a different picture, one that is looking more and more like the final result: Ballot Measure 1 being defeated by a slim margin of approximately five percent.
The measure, a veto referendum, sought to repeal Senate Bill 21, which was approved by the legislature and signed into law by Gov. Sean Parnell (R) last year. The bill implemented a new taxation system, known as the More Alaska Production Act (MAPA), for companies extracting oil in the state. MAPA replaced the former tax structure, Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share (ACES), which was ushered in under former governor Sarah Palin (R) in 2007. Those who supported a "yes" vote on Ballot Measure 1 hoped to repeal SB 21, as they felt it was a "giveaway" for oil companies, with little to no upside for Alaskans. Opponents of Ballot Measure 1 wanted to keep MAPA in place and fought for a "no" vote on the measure, believing the tax breaks were necessary to incentivize oil companies to continue drilling in the state.
Gov. Parnell, an ardent supporter of SB 21 who opposed Ballot Measure 1, spoke about the apparent outcome of the election, saying, “I think it [MAPA] ought to be given time to work, and the testimony was it will be about three to five years, and I think some of the voters as well who weighed in on the ‘no’ side ... we’re willing to say ‘Let’s give this a chance.’ We saw the production decline under ACES, and it’s time to give another vehicle a chance.” Though the measure now appears poised for defeat, supporters are encouraged by the narrow margin, especially in light of how much money was poured into the opposition campaign versus the supporting one. "I think it's very close, but very exciting, with the millions spent by the oil companies, " said Malcolm Roberts, a member of the Yes on 1 steering committee. The opposing groups raised over $14.2 million, while supporters collected just over $487, 000.
You might also like
How do you think the results of the 2014 and 2016 US elections will look like? | Yahoo Answers
The 2014 elections depend on what happens in the upcoming budget and debt ceiling fights. If the government shuts down or we default on our debt, the Republicans will lose ground in both the House and Senate, but will maintain majority in the House because of gerrymandering. 2016 depends more on the candidate the Republicans nominate than anything else. It is very difficult for one party to retain the presidency for more that 8 years, so Democrats will be fighting an uphill battle in the election. If the Republicans nominate an actual moderate, they will probably win, but if they nomina…
Will the 2014 and 2016 elections represent a realignment in American politics? | Yahoo Answers
If republicans don't wake up and see what's happening around them, those elections could spell the end of their relevance in our political system.